Two-tier policing describes unequal enforcement of laws based on identity. The Henry Nowak case highlights how this concept manifests, sparking debate on systemic bias and public trust.
In December 2022, police in Southampton handcuffed 18-year-old Henry Nowak as he lay dying from a stab wound, believing a false claim by his attacker, Vickrum Digwa, a Sikh man, that Nowak had racially abused him. The officers’ initial treatment of the dying victim as a suspect—while appearing to side with the attacker—has been widely condemned as a stark example of two-tier policing based on race and religion. An Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation is ongoing, and the police have apologized to Nowak’s family. The incident has fueled debate about whether such bias is systemic or an isolated failure.
The IOPC investigation into the officers’ behaviour is ongoing, and it will be some time before we fully understand what happened in this case or whether it is indicative of wider problems in policing.
The case has drawn comparisons to other high-profile incidents, such as the Muscatine Iowa shooting where six died in a family tragedy, illustrating how law enforcement’s initial assumptions can shape public perception and trust.
The concept of two-tier policing refers to law enforcement applying different standards depending on a person’s race, ethnicity, religion, or social status. This can manifest as either harsher treatment for some groups or more lenient treatment for others. In the UK, the term gained prominence after the 1993 murder of Stephen Lawrence, where police were criticized for failing to treat the case seriously because the victim was Black. More recently, during protests, critics alleged that police were overly cautious about offending certain groups, leading to inconsistent enforcement.
One officer told the BBC: “We’ve had several reports about how racist we are in the last few years when it comes to black people and Asian people, and so we’re very cautious when handling cases involving different races – and so what happened in Southampton is easy to see why. Maybe we’re too cautious now.”
The core issue is whether police forces can balance cultural sensitivity with impartial enforcement—a challenge that has grown more acute in an era of heightened scrutiny.
The IOPC investigation into the Nowak case will be crucial in determining if the officers’ actions were an anomaly or indicative of broader patterns. Proponents of the systemic view point to statistics showing disparities in stop-and-search, arrests, and use of force against different ethnic groups. For example, Home Office data consistently shows that Black people in England and Wales are more than three times as likely to be stopped and searched as white people. Defenders of the police emphasize individual officer discretion and training gaps, rather than systemic bias.
“We have such a hard job and we’re always scrutinised. But we need to get it right. I just wish people got the pressure we’re under because of the claims we’re racist,” one officer said.
Geopolitical dynamics also intersect with policing: tensions between the US and Iran, for instance, can affect how law enforcement handles cases involving Middle Eastern communities, as discussed in our analysis of US and Iran News: Tech Sanctions and Cyber Threats.