Blaenavon Wildfire: Firefighters Battle Mountain Blaze for Over 24 Hours
Firefighters have been battling a major wildfire near Blaenavon for nearly 24 hours, with smoke visible up to 10 miles away.
The Trump administration revived the public charge rule, making it harder for immigrants to get green cards if they use SNAP, Medicaid, or housing aid. Learn what changed.
The Trump administration has revived and expanded a public charge rule that will likely make it tougher for many immigrants to obtain green cards if they use or are deemed likely to need public benefits such as food stamps (SNAP), Medicaid, or housing vouchers. The final rule, published July 20, 2026, rescinds a 2022 Biden-era rule that excluded non-cash benefits from consideration.
Under the new rule, immigration officers can consider a wider array of means-tested benefits, including Medicaid, SNAP, and housing assistance, on a case-by-case basis, along with factors like age, health, family status, assets, and education. Historically, only cash assistance (e.g., TANF, SSI) was considered. The rule is more expansive than a similar 2020 Trump rule. DHS states about 588,000 applicants are subject to public charge reviews annually. The change may have a chilling effect, causing immigrant families to disenroll from or avoid safety net programs even for eligible U.S. citizen children. The Biden-era rule had limited consideration to primarily cash welfare and long-term institutional care. The new rule restores broader discretion from the first Trump administration.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is rescinding a 2022 Biden-era regulation that narrowed how officers apply the long-standing “public charge” test — an immigration screening tool used to determine whether applicants are likely to rely on government support. The Biden-era rule, issued in 2022, limited the benefits DHS could consider to primarily cash welfare payments meant to cover basic living expenses and long-term institutional care paid for by the federal government.
The new final rule restores the broader discretion U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) had during the first Trump administration. Officers can now conduct case-by-case reviews that consider an applicant’s age, health, family status, assets, financial resources, education, skills, and whether the person has received means-tested taxpayer-funded benefits, including food stamps, Medicaid, and housing assistance.
“Under @POTUS Trump, DHS is restoring the basic principle that immigrants must be able to support themselves,” the Department of Homeland Security posted to X on Thursday. “We are reaffirming the requirement of self-reliance, protecting public resources, and ending policies that encouraged dependency on hard-working American taxpayers.”
About 588,000 applicants are subject to public charge reviews annually, on average, according to DHS. Historically, immigration officers only considered cash assistance, such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) from Social Security, when reviewing applications. The new rule is more expansive than a similar one that President Donald Trump’s first administration put into effect in early 2020.
The change may directly affect hundreds of thousands of people applying for green cards from inside the U.S. each year. It could trigger a broader ripple effect if immigrant families avoid health care, food, or housing assistance — even when they or their U.S.-citizen children legally qualify — out of fear that tapping into those benefits could ultimately hurt their immigration cases.
Under existing federal immigration law, some individuals applying for a visa, admission to the U.S., or green cards can be deemed inadmissible if the government determines they are likely “at any time” to become a public charge. The new rule allows immigration officers to take into account a wider array of public assistance programs when determining whether green card applicants will likely become public charges, which is one factor in the evaluation.
Benefits now considered include:
Officers will also weigh an applicant’s age, health, family status, assets, financial resources, education, and skills.
Advocates warn that the rule may have a “chilling effect,” prompting immigrant families to disenroll from or not apply for safety net programs that they — and particularly their U.S. citizen children — are eligible to receive, for fear of hurting their chances to be approved for a green card. This echoes concerns raised during the first Trump administration’s similar rule in 2020, when reports showed declines in SNAP and Medicaid enrollment among eligible immigrant households.
For context, the Trump Public Charge Immigration Rule has been a flashpoint in immigration policy debates, and the latest expansion is likely to intensify those discussions.
The new rule is more expansive than the 2020 Trump rule, which itself was a significant departure from historical practice. The Biden administration revoked that earlier rule in 2022, limiting consideration to primarily cash welfare and long-term institutional care. The new rule restores the broader discretion from the first Trump administration.
Under the 2022 Biden-era rule, DHS could only consider cash welfare payments meant to cover basic living expenses and long-term institutional care paid for by the federal government. Non-cash benefits like SNAP, Medicaid, and housing assistance were excluded.
The new rule rescinds that 2022 regulation and returns to a more expansive interpretation of the public charge test.
Green card applicants from inside the U.S. who have used or are deemed likely to need public benefits will face greater scrutiny. The rule applies to applicants for lawful permanent residence (green cards) who are subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility. It does not apply to refugees, asylees, or certain other humanitarian categories.
Applicants should be aware that using SNAP, Medicaid, or housing assistance could now be held against them in the public charge determination. The rule also allows officers to consider the applicant’s overall profile, including age, health, family status, assets, financial resources, education, and skills.
The rule has drawn sharp criticism from immigrant advocacy groups, who argue it will harm public health and food security by discouraging eligible families from accessing benefits. Some states and cities may challenge the rule in court, as they did with the 2020 version.
DHS has stated that the rule is necessary to ensure that immigrants are self-sufficient and do not become a burden on taxpayers. The agency estimates that about 588,000 applicants are subject to public charge reviews annually.
For now, the rule is in effect as of July 20, 2026. Immigrant families and their advocates should monitor legal challenges and any guidance from USCIS on how the rule will be implemented.
Continue exploring trending topics.